Example of the 17 sections on an EVA (left) and an iSense (right) 3D scan. The English version of this contract is available under www.finescanner.com/en/eula. We examined the overall agreement between measurement methods using all sections at the same time as non-constant and repeated measurements for each technical analysis described by Bland-Altman [29]. We then checked the consistency between the methods for each section using the constant and repeated measurement for each specialized analysis [29]. For both analyses, we reported absolute and relative distortion and 95% loA [32] and 95% CI bias and LoA, which gave the accuracy of the estimates (SE; [33]). In the overall analysis, we also examined the intra-cccuzine correlation coefficient (ICC) and the r value for distortion homogeneity [30]. With respect to section analysis, we examined the repeatability coefficient of each method [30]. CCI`s estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated on the basis of an average (k-3), absolute matching, and a two-track mixed effect model (ICC (3.3)) [34.35]. CCI is unseeded and provides information on the reliability of each method. The uniformity of bias made it possible to study the relationship between bias and the size of terms. When a relationship was found, uneven distortions and loA were calculated and the distortion equation was indicated.
The repeatability coefficient assesses the variation in repeated measurements taken on the same theme under identical conditions and also indicates a baseline for assessing variability between methods, with a lower value indicating better repeatability. The ICC and the uniformity of distortion were not estimated in the counter-sequence analysis because of the low degree of freedom (13), while the repeatability coefficient in the overall analysis was not relevant to the differences in scope between the sections. Comparison of the absolute and relative means of the two manual measurements (N-14) and the average values of the three scan measurements (N-14), compliance limits, the repeatability coefficient in the methods, and the homogeneity of the data for each section of the lower end 300 mm above the average patella (0mm) at 180 mm above the average patella. This end-user license agreement (`the agreement`)is a legally binding agreement between you, a person at least 14 years of age who uses the application service (`User` or `You`) and ABBYY, which regulates the use of the service and application, as well as the resources and materials available there. While there are undoubtedly some advantages to digitizing contracts, some risks are also linked and need to be taken into account. Your awareness of its drawbacks and your knowledge of the alternative solutions that can be the application of Autenti`s electronic signature will allow you to effectively implement your signed contracts. We compared the scanners in three ways: time for recording the three scans, time for post-processing of the three scans and leg circumst for each section in mm. For both time measurements, we launched the stopwatch during the first action for the first scan and it ran until the end of the last action for the third scan. Manual measurement times were not recorded because there was no post-processing or any way to have a 3D model. Manual measurement was used as an indicative measure, as this is the technique currently used in clinics, while the EVA scanner has been used, as it is considered a reference scanner because of its 0.5 mm resolution with an accuracy of 0.01 mm (technical information from the manufacturer).